After a little bit of hiatus, the view from the Editor's chair returns and with it a few thoughts about the incident which caused so much debate and discussion.
Now the dust has apparently settled, I thought I’d write a
special piece which details my opinions on the Fretter-Goulakos incident and
all that. As I said, it’s my opinion and I don’t expect anyone to wholly agree
with what I’ll say but this is just me being me. Got that?
The whole incident has certainly left an indelible mark on
hockey over here. One that may take weeks or even longer to remove. I think it
will still be talked about by some and they won’t let it lie especially if a
Steelers player in the future throws a hit on an opposing player and the
opposing fans are in uproar over it. It’s bound to happen, so let’s be
realistic here. Mind you, could it be argued that us Steelers fans will feel
equally aggrieved if one of our players is subject to something similar? No
team it can be said is immune to it.
So onto the incident itself. Prior to it happening, Goulakos had
already served a 2 plus 10 checking from behind penalty in the first period for
a hit on Steelers winger Levi Nelson. What was missed then was a clear slash by
the afore mentioned defenceman on the winger which could have got him in
serious hot water if spotted. Fans spotted it, myself included, but the call on
the night for that remained just the 2 plus 10. Early signs of a chippy game.
Then after Zack Fitzgerald was ejected on 5 plus game misconduct for high
sticking on Brendan Connolly, you just knew it was going to get worse unless referee
Michael Hicks got a lid on it. Unfortunately, as we all know now, he failed in
that respect and in my humble opinion here: that was a contributory factor to
it all.
A minute before the “incident” Goulakos had shown the good
side to his game, scoring an absolute howitzer of a strike over the glove of
Ervins Mustukovs and into the top shelf. A goal that most NHL goalies would
have struggled to keep out, it was a peach. Then it happened, Colton Fretter is
sent flying into the boards by the Giants defenceman. A clear penalty, right?
No, Mr Hicks plays on and allows it to go unpunished. Fretter picks himself up,
and looks around for the call but realises it is not going to come so seeks
personal retribution on the man who sent him flying. He travels at such speed
that Goulakos never sees him coming, and contrary to some description, he
(Fretter) didn’t leave the bench. Fretter’s stick is tossed away as he zooms in
on his target, and he arrives on scene to dish personal punishment.
Let me make this clear already, in my opinion you can’t do
what he (Fretter) did even if the official offered you no protection on a
previous clash. Imagine being out on the town and somebody gets your red mist
going under the nose of a policeman and nothing gets done, so you decide to
take it out on your preparator – you would not expect the policeman to turn a
blind eye to it all would you? You’d be arrested, wouldn’t you? That’s how you
can possibly see a similarity with this. Anyway, I digress, as Fretter starts
to wade into Goulakos, the defenceman’s skates suddenly rise and to me that is
as dangerous as being punched if not more. Skate cuts if they pierce the skin
can be life threatening, remember Clint Malarchuk in the NHL all those years.
With the body position of both Goulakos and Fretter as they were, it could have
seen a stray swish of a blade to pierce Fretter’s shorts and meet unprotected
skin. Pierce that and you will see blood, and that could have been damaging if
not dealt with immediately.
Anyway, after the melee had been brought under control,
eventually, Fretter was given a 5 plus game misconduct for checking from behind
for his part in the incident and Goulakos was assessed a match penalty for
“kicking” but there didn’t seem to be any kicking motion. Dangerous play maybe
with the skates in the air. I was convinced there would be more to come from
it, and sure enough there was. The so-called Department of Player Safety ruled
that Fretter’s part to be upgraded to a single game ban and for Goulakos a three-match
suspension due to multiple incidents which had gone on in the game. Cue media
meltdown with fans, current EIHL players and former players going mental. I was
really surprised that the one game ban was issued, it deserved far much more.
Cries of “Steelers run the league and DoPS” were all too often on social media
from fans from other clubs which is, and has never been, true. Cardiff Devils
GM Todd Kelman had hinted a year ago at a Devils fan forum, that DoPS was just
one person (former league referee Simon Kirkham) but nobody knew if this was correct
as the league was still not transparent enough to admit it.
The majority of the Steelers fan base were amazed at the
decision, and had to field so much vitriol and at times, it felt like, pure
hatred from the fans from around the country. Makes you wonder what kind of
kick these people get from this, and certainly defies the logic of a hockey
family sticking together. Steelers were public enemy even though the club had
nothing to do with it, it was just a Molotov cocktail of Hicks, Fretter,
Goulakos and DoPS as far as I was, and still am, concerned. Obviously with this
outcry, the league had to act because the good name of the league was being
besmirched through plenty of mudslinging. Thankfully, they did in 24 hours and
organised an independent review which involved former NHL linesman Lyle Seltz.
The outcome was greeted with relief but still contentious all the same, Fretter’s
ban was upgraded to six games but Goulakos downgraded to two.
Whilst personally I welcomed the increase of Fretter’s ban,
I can only feel that Goulakos can count himself a bit lucky with the
downgrade of his suspension. For the independent opinion saying that Goulakos
might have been concussed when he raised his skates, that’s something I ain’t
buying. Sorry but I am not. There are rumoured reports that he was laughing and
joking about at all with a team-mate post game, and if that’s right: you
certainly don’t do that if you’re suffering from concussion type symptoms. Yet
it is what it is now, and I hope that this whole sorry tale is now done and
dusted bar some people on social media who seem hell bent on not letting it lie
down quietly. The cynic in me just feels like that the blue touch paper has
been lit now, and we could be witnesses to more controversy when the Steelers
and Giants play each other next. There’s definitely a bit of bad blood going
on, which makes for an interesting rivalry, but hopefully common sense will
prevail. We can only wish and dream, can we?
Yours in hockey,Mark
Thanks for reading guys. If you want to get involved please contact us on Twitter or find us on Facebook and like us and leave a comment:-
@FrozenSteelBlog@FrozenSteelMNL
@FrozenSteelJr
@BTI_Podcast
@hockeybhoy
@Disgu15ed
@SedgyFergus
@georgefbarber
Check out Breaking The Ice Available to listen and download on iTunes and SoundCloud.
Or Email the team at Frozen Steel
You can also get involved in Steelers related discussions by joining the forums at Steel Talk